PDA

View Full Version : Earth rang like a bell


anand
10th January 2005, 11:59 AM
The world "rang like a bell" after the Sumatra earthquake. Shock waves produced by the magnitude 9.0 quake would have circled the world several times a day, possibly for days, Clive Collins, a scientist with Geoscience Australia, said.

Mr Collins said earthquakes sent seismic waves in every direction. "Some pass right through the world, others travel around it, on the surface," he said. "They get to to the other side but they won't stop . . . they keep travelling. They just get smaller and smaller."

Surface waves travelled "fairly slowly, probably three or four kilometres a second. Because they are very low frequency waves you can't feel them."

Others hit the Earth's mantle or its molten iron core and bounced back. The result was that the Earth reverberated like a bell, or a water-filled balloon.

Although scientists are yet to analyse the seismic waves from the Boxing Day quake, it is expected they will be similar to those produced by the 9.5 magnitude Chilean quake that rocked the world in 1960.

"Following the Chile quake, the world oscillated for at least three days," Mr Collins said. When eventually analysed, the waves would give scientists a look deep inside the planet. "It's a bit like giving the world an ultrasound," he said.

Meanwhile, scientists continue to dismiss any link between the Boxing Day quake and a massive 8.1 magnitude quake that struck near Macquarie Island, south of Tasmania, on Christmas Eve.

"The occurrence of two great earthquakes within such a short space of time is indeed striking," a statement on the United States Geological Survey's website said. "However, we do not yet see evidence for a strong causal relationship between the two earthquakes."

The Macquarie Island quake was "very far" from Sumatra "and occurred on a different plate boundary". The two events were probably "a coincidence".

The US scientists say the Sumatra quake may have changed the world, including the speed of its rotation.

"In places, the block of crust beneath the sea floor (but above the fault line) is likely to have moved in the order of 10 metres to the west-southwest."


News from:www.theage.com.au/news/Asia-tsunami/ Seismic-waves-strike-to-the-core/2005/01/03/1104601250230.html

vinu
11th January 2005, 04:09 AM
Hi, the above post is much infromative and interesting,

Is it possible to forecaste eath quakes?
What are the difficulties behind it?

As i remember, i happened to read a bit, six-month ago, an article
came in 'GRL' or 'Nature' ( i forgot), that some statistical
techniques are under practice for forecasting the quakes in
advance they occure. However they conclude, many of these
method can not improve its accuracy beyond a 30 percentage,
it is too low compared to our climate forecast now being done.

Why this 'quakes' can not be forecaste? is it because the simulatnious
observation (like sounding? ) is not possible globally?

last year or so, one article came in 'Nature', that geo-scientists
are noticing the speed of the Indian continent moves very fast to the
north 1cm per 100 years. It is a 'huge speed' in geological
time scales. It is noticed by some American Scientists by GIS-Satellite
study that, this gygantic movement building up the stress beneath the
Himalaya and any time (they warn in coming 10 years) it may release
this stress (energy) by slipping between the plates under it and results as
massive earth quakes. If it occurs the devastation
will be very large, because most of the populated
countries beneath the Himalaya ( China, Tibet, India, Nepal) will be
affected,

human reached well above the sky, up to Mars,
he cant predict some traps hidden under his feet here in the earth :rolleyes:

oopps! i gone wrong way i think, this posting seems not-appropriate in
this section.

praveen
11th January 2005, 01:00 PM
As i remember, i happened to read a bit, six-month ago, an article came in 'GRL' or 'Nature' ( i forgot), that some statistical techniques are under practice for forecasting the quakes in advance they occure.

But for a statistical study they should get some long term data of earth quakes.
Is there any record of earth quakes of that much period?